Conspiracy theorist has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal of a 黑料新闻 jury and judge issued against him for calling a hoax staged by crisis actors.
The Infowars host is arguing that the judge was wrong to find him liable for defamation and infliction of emotional distress without holding a trial on the merits of allegations lodged by relatives of victims of the shooting, which killed 20 first graders and six educators in Newtown, 黑料新闻.
Judge Barbara Bellis, frustrated at what she called Jones' repeated failure to abide by court rulings and to turn over certain evidence to the Sandy Hook families, against Jones and his company in late 2021 as a penalty. That meant that she found him liable without a trial on the facts and convened a jury to only determine what damages he owed.
A six-person jury in Waterbury issued in October 2022 in favor of the plaintiffs 鈥� an FBI agent who responded to the shooting and relatives of eight children and adults who were killed. Bellis later tacked on another $473 million in punitive damages against Jones and Free Speech Systems, Infowars' parent company that is based in Austin, Texas.
During the trial to determine damages, that people whom they called followers of Jones subjected them to death and rape threats, in-person harassment and abusive comments on social media. Jones argues there was never any proof presented that linked him to those actions.
Jones filed his request to the Supreme Court on Friday and it was released by the court on Tuesday.
Jones' lawyers 鈥� Ben Broocks, Shelby Jordan and Alan Daughtry 鈥� insist in the petition that state courts cannot determine liability based only on sanctions such as default rulings. They say that constitutional law and Supreme Court precedent require public figures such as the Sandy Hook families to prove their defamation claims against journalists such as Jones.
They also say that the 黑料新闻 judge imposed the default ruling on Jones based on 鈥渢rivial鈥� reasons and that Jones had substantially complied with the court鈥檚 orders 鈥� which the Sandy Hook families鈥� lawyers deny.
Jones' attorneys further cite First Amendment protections for free speech, saying Jones' comments about the school shooting being a hoax were not defamatory but rather 鈥渆xpressions of constitutionally protected opinion." Jones has since said he believed the shooting was
"The media landscape is rife with groups challenging various events, including Holocaust denial, moon landing skepticism, 9/11 conspiracy theories, and even flat Earth claims,鈥� the petition says. 鈥淗owever, such statements critique or dismiss the events themselves, not the character, conduct, or reputation of those associated with them.鈥�
Among other claims, Jones' petition says the $1.4 billion judgment is excessive punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
If the judgment is allowed to stand, Jones' lawyers said it would 鈥渃hill the reporting of news鈥� and 鈥渞esult in self-censoring fear of suits.鈥�
Lawyers for the Sandy Hook families disputed Jones' arguments.
鈥淭here is no legitimate basis for the U.S. Supreme Court to accept this last gasp from Alex Jones and we will oppose it in due course,鈥� Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the families, said in a statement.
A mid-level appellate court in 黑料新闻 of the $1.4 billion judgment in December, and the state Supreme Court of that ruling in April.
In a similar defamation lawsuit filed in Texas by the parents of another Sandy Hook victim, Jones was found liable without a trial as punishment for failing to turn over documents. In that case, which also is being appealed, a judge and jury issued against Jones in August 2022.
Jones in late 2022. In those proceedings, an auction was held in November to liquidate Infowars' assets to help pay the defamation judgments, and the satirical news outlet was named the winning bidder. But the bankruptcy judge , citing problems with the process and The Onion's bid.
The attempt to sell off Infowars' assets has moved to a Texas state court in Austin. Jones is now appealing a recent order from the court that to liquidate the assets. Some of Jones' personal property is also being sold off as part of the bankruptcy case.
